检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宏宇 WANG Hong-yu(Shuangyashan Double Ore Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shuangyashan,Heilongjiang Province, 155100 China)
机构地区:[1]双鸭山双矿医院妇产科,黑龙江双鸭山155100
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2017年第3期59-60,共2页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的探究非药物治疗及其联合胰岛素控制妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖水平的临床作用。方法选取2015年10月—2016年10月期间于该院就诊及治疗的50例妊娠期糖尿病患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为两组,每组25例,对对照组给予非药物治疗,对实验组给予非药物治疗及其联合胰岛素控制,分析两组患者的效果。结果实验组患者的临床治疗总有效率(96.00%)与对照组患者(72.00%)相比,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),实验组患者的治疗满意度(96.00%)与对照组患者(68.00%)相比,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对妊娠期糖尿病患者给予非药物治疗联合胰岛素控制的效果较好。Objective To explore the non-drug therapy and its joint gestational diabetes insulin control blood sugar levels in patients with clinical effect. Methods Selection in October 2015 to October 2016 in our hospital during the period of diagnosis and treatment of 50 patients with gestational diabetes as the research object, according to random number table method is divided into two groups, each group with 25 cases, the control group given non-drug therapy, to give non-drug therapy to the experimental group and the joint insulin to control, analyze the effect of two groups of patients. Results The clinical total effective rate of experimental group patients (96.00%) patients (72.00%) compared with control group, there was difference between groups (P 〈 0.05), the treatment of experimental group patients satisfaction (96.00%) compared with control group (68.00%) patients with clear difference between groups ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Giving non-drug therapy in patients with gestational diabetes insulin joint control effect is better .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145