创建典范与学术商榷:民国颜李学研究述论——以梁启超、胡适、钱穆为中心  

Model Creation & Academic Discussion:A Study of Yan-Li School in Times of the Republic of China——Centering round Liang Qichao,Hu Shi,Qian Mu

作　　者：王学斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校文史教研部,北京100091

出　　处：《南京政治学院学报》2017年第2期109-122,共14页Journal of PLA Nanjing Institute of Politics

摘　　要：作为民国清学史研究的代表人物,梁启超、胡适和钱穆三位学人在颜李学研究上用力颇深,探讨甚多,促使该研究走向深入。梁、胡之研究体现出其沟通中西的创新与努力,其典范意义值得肯定;而钱穆对前者的反拨则彰显着他对传统文化的"温情与敬意",双方有着各自的关怀与合理性。是故三者在颜李学研究上之阐述与商榷,大致同其学术立场、治学路径和文化观念的相异有关,这不仅具有学术史上的研究价值,亦折射出思想史上的检讨意义。换言之,三位学人的颜李学研究可谓民国清学史研究大势的一个缩影。As representative figures of the Qing history research in the times of the RC, Liang Qichao, Hu Shi and Qian Mu had much discussion on the Yan-Li school. Liang and Hu's research exhibited their ability and efforts to creatively communicate between China and the West. Its exemplary significance is worthy of affirmation. Qian Mu's studies on the former revealed his tendency of'warmth and respect'toward the traditional culture and each had its own care and rationality. Therefore, the exposition and discussion of the Yan-Li school by the three scholars, their similar academic stance, paths of learning and cultural perceptions are not only credited with the research value in terms of academic history but also with the significance of review in terms of intellectual history. In other words, the three scholars' research on Yan-Li school can be described as a microcosm of the study of the history of the Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：颜李学 戴震学 梁启超 胡适 钱穆 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]