乐维静与力蒙欣在无痛人流中的麻醉效果及静脉注射疼痛情况比较  

Comparison of anesthesia effect of leweijing and limengxin in painless induced abortion and the pain situation through intravenous injection

作　　者：曹凯[1] 张治明[1] 陆文龙[1] 张安生[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南省郴州市第一人民医院麻醉科,423000

出　　处：《临床合理用药杂志》2017年第12期44-45,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use

摘　　要：目的比较乐维静与力蒙欣在无痛人流中的麻醉效果及静脉注射疼痛程度。方法选取郴州市第一人民医院2015年2—6月收治的行无痛人流术患者120例,采取信封抽签法将患者随机分为A组与B组,各60例。A组予以乐维静麻醉;B组予以力蒙欣麻醉。比较两组患者体动发生率、麻醉时间、丙泊酚使用量、疼痛评分。结果两组患者体动发生率、麻醉时间、丙泊酚使用量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组患者疼痛程度优于A组,明显痛发生率低于A组(P<0.05)。结论乐维静与力蒙欣在无痛人流中的麻醉效果相当,但力蒙欣较乐维静静脉注射疼痛较轻。Objective To compare the anesthesia effect of leweijing and limengxin in painless induced abortion and the pain situation through intravenous injection. Methods A total of 120 cases of patients underwent painless induced abortion were selected from February to June of 2015 in the Frist People＇s Hospital of Chenzhou City,which were randomly divided into A group and B group according to envelope lottery,60 case in each group. A group was anesthesia by leweijing,B group was anesthesia by limengxin. The body movement incidence,anesthesia time,propofol usages and pain scores were compared between the two groups. Results No statistically significant differences of body movement incidence,anesthesia time or propofol usages was found between the two groups（ P 〈0. 05）. The B group of pain degree was better than A group,rate of obviously pain was lower than A group（ P 〈0. 05）. Conclusions Leweijing has a same anesthesia effects in painless induced abortion with limengxin,but limengxin has a milder pain degree.

关 键 词：异丙酚 注射疼痛 

分 类 号：R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]