“行政拘留”的扩张与行政刑法的转向  

Expansion of Administrative Detention and Diversion of Administrative Criminal Law

作　　者：李晓明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院 [2]苏州大学刑事法研究中心

出　　处：《法学评论》2017年第3期46-54,共9页Law Review

基　　金：2014年司法部国家法治与法学理论重点研究项目"中国特色轻罪体系建构研究"(项目编号:14SFB1004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：修订后的环保法第63条规定有"行政拘留",且要求将案件移送公安机关,最近全国人大颁布的网络安全法也规定了"行政拘留",引起学界高度关注。一是该"行政拘留"并非治安性质,如环保法中的拘留,易引起拘留性质和分类及执法主体的争论。二是有可能引发行政刑法的转向,即在我国刑法之外建构"准刑事性质"的"行政刑法",内容包括行政拘留、收容教养、收容教育、强制戒毒等人身自由罚的司法化,以及建构行政刑法程序问题等。Article 63 of the revised Environmental Protection Law provides for ＂administrative detention＂,and also requires the case should be transferred to public security organs.Recently the National People＇s Congress promulgated the Network Security Law also provides for ＂administrative detention＂,causing great concern to academia.Obviously,some ＂administrative detention＂ is not the nature of public security punish,such as environmental protection law in the detention,easy to cause the nature of detention and classification and law enforcement of the main controversy.Related to this,there is a change of administrative criminal law,that is to say,the construction of the administrative criminal law with quasi-criminal nature outside the criminal law and the judicial issue of personal freedom penalty such as administrative detention,detaining education,compulsory drug treatment,etc.

关 键 词：行政拘留 准刑事性质 行政刑法 人身自由罚 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]