德国侵权法上的继发性损害类型及其启示  

The Types of Insidious Spreading Loss in German Tort Law and Its Enlightenment

作　　者：朱晓峰[1] ZHU Xiao-feng(Law School, China University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《现代法学》2017年第3期160-169,共10页Modern Law Science

基　　金：北京市2015年社会科学基金项目(15FXC046);中央财经大学2014年度中财121人才工程青年博士发展基金(QBJ1407)

摘　　要：在标的物所有权移转后因其自身自始即存在的瑕疵,导致物之整体价值减少、无法使用或完全灭失的场合下,当受害人因物之瑕疵担保责任时效期间届满而无法通过合同责任主张法律救济时,德国司法实践为给受害人提供充分法律救济,而通过法之续造,发展出所有权侵害的继发性损害类型,并将之纳入《民法典》第823条第1款的涵摄范畴,为受害人提供了适当的救济方案。对中国的司法实践而言,在中国特色社会主义法律体系已经形成时,审慎关注德国司法实践于此通过规范解释路径处理法之安全性与向社会生活开放性间之紧张关系的有益经验,有助于法院具体案件审理时,能在维护法之安全以及权威的同时保障具体人在法律上的充分实现。After the transfer of the ownership of the subject matter, there could be a problem that the total value of the object itself is reduced or it cannot be used or is completely destroyed due to the flaw of its own existence. Under this condition, the buyer cannot claim legal rights through contractual liability because the de- fects liability period has passed. However, in order to provide adequate legal relief to the buyer, the German judicial practice developed the concept of insidious spreading loss, and included it into the Article 823 paragraph 1, Civil Code. For China＇ s judicial practice, it is important to pay high attention to the German judicial practice, which will be helpful for Chinese courts to deal with similar cases.

关 键 词：继发性损害 整体性利益 等值性利益 所有权侵害 物的瑕疵 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]