检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡尹慧[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《河北法学》2017年第6期165-171,共7页Hebei Law Science
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划项目<农村老人空巢化与社区居家养老服务模式研究>(2013ybsh045)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:从法理逻辑的角度,对行政不作为进行法律规制符合保护行政相对人的合法权益、促使行政机关履行其法定义务以及维护良好的行政法律秩序的要求。然而,现有对行政不作为的法律规制依然存在投诉机制不健全,内部监察缺位以及司法救济范围过窄等问题。因此,健全投诉机制、规定内部监察的具体程序以及适当扩大司法救济范围等是对行政不作为进行多元治理的有效机制,确保其充分发挥对行政不作为应有的规制作用。From the perspective of legal logic, legal regulation of administrative omission conform to requirements, such as the protection of the legitimate interests of the administrative counterpart, impelling the administrative organ to perform its statutory obligations and maintain the good order of administrative law. However, there are still some problems in the legal regulation imperfect complaint mechanism, the lack of administrative omission, such as the of internal supervision, and the narrow scope of judicial relief. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an effective mechanism for the multiple governance of administrative omission, such as improving complaint mechanism, specific procedures for the internal supervision and appropriate expansion of the scope of judicial remedy, so that to ensure the full play of the regulation function for administrative omission.
分 类 号:DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28