论我国检察官客观义务的完善  

On How to Improve Prosecutor's Objective Obligation in China

作　　者：马春娟[1] 姚晓晓[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《山西广播电视大学学报》2017年第2期36-39,共4页Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University

摘　　要：检察官客观义务有价值层面、制度层面和理论层面三个不同层级的内涵。从制度层面分析,由于侦查中心主义、检察一体和绩效考核影响,我国检察官客观义务不仅在立法规定上有缺陷,司法实践中也出现异化。为保障我国检察官客观义务的真正实现,使得检察官站在客观公正的立场上推进刑事诉讼程序的进行,应当明确检察官的主体地位、构建全面客观义务和设置合理起诉标准。There are three different aspects of connotation remaining in prosecutor＇s objective obligations -- value aspect, system aspect, and theory aspect. In terms of system aspect, under the influence of investigative central- ism, procuratorial integration, and performance appraisal, the prosecutors＇ objective obligations in our country not only have defects in legislation, judicial practice also appears alienation. In order to ensure the real fulfillment of those objective obligations of prosecutors in our country and make prosecutors stand on the objective and fair side to propel the proceeding of criminal procedure, it requires clear recognition of the principal status of prosecutors and establishment of comprehensive and objective obligations as well as reasonable prosecution standards.

关 键 词：检察官客观义务 检察一体 检察独立 检察监督 控辩平衡 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]