检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省青岛市市立医院东院眼科,青岛266000
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2017年第4期421-421,423,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:研究老年性白内障患者应用临床护理路径的护理效果。方法:随机选择2014年1月~2016年10月笔者所在医院收治的90例老年性白内障患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字法,将90例患者分成两组,观察组和对照组,对照组45例老年性自内障患者给予常规护理,观察组45例老年性白内障患者进行临床护理路径,对两组患者进行比较。结果:观察组护理满意度为91.11%,对照组护理满意度为75.56%,观察组满意度明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组住院时间为(8.1±1.9)d,对照组住院时间为(15.2±4.3)d,与对照组相比,观察组住院时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:老年性白内障患者应用临床护理路径可以缩短患者住院时间,提高患者护理满意度。Objective: To study the nursing effect of clinical nursing pathways in senile cataract patients. Methods: 90 cases of senile cataract patients were randomly selected from January 2014 to October 2016. According to the random number method, 90 patients were divided into two groups , 45 cases of senile cataract patients were given conventional nursing care for the control group , the other 45 cases of se-nile cataract patients to the clinical nursing pathways for the observation group,compared the two groups of nursing satisfaction,hospital stay and nursing results. Results: The satisfaction of the observation group was 91. 11% and the control group was 75. 56%. Compared with the control group,the satisfaction of the observation group was better than that of the control group. The difference of the two groups was signifi-cant (P 〈0. 05). The observation group hospitalization time was (8. 1±1. 9) d,control group hospitalization time was (15. 2 ±4. 3) d, compared with the control group(P〈0. 05) . Conclusion: Clinical nursing pathways in senile cataract patients can shorten the hospitalization time and improve the patientsr nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222