检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]川北医学院附属医院骨科 [2]川北医学院附属医院护理部,四川南充637000
出 处:《川北医学院学报》2017年第2期218-220,共3页Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
基 金:川北医学院重点项目(201512)
摘 要:目的:观察冲击波治疗对上肢慢性损伤性疼痛患者的临床疗效。方法:50例上肢慢性损伤性疼痛患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各25例,对照组采用传统综合治疗方法,观察组仅运用体外冲击波治疗仪治疗,治疗前与疗程结束后用疼痛数字评分法(NRS)对患者分别进行疼痛评估及疗效对比。结果:两组患者经过治疗后,对照组有效17例,占68.00%,无效8例,占32.00%;观察组有效23例,占92.00%,无效2例,占8.00%。与对照组相比,观察组在治疗后NRS得分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论:冲击波治疗对上肢慢性损伤性疼痛有确切的疗效。Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of shock wave treatment on chronic traumatic pain of upper limb. Meth-ods :50 cases of upper limb chronic traumatic pain patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each of 25cases. Patients in control group were treated with traditional conventional therapy while the observation group was treated with shockwave only. Compared the efficacy of two groups and Numerical rating scale (N R S) was delivered to each patient for evaluating the levelof pain before and after treatment. Results : After treatment, 17 effective cases were accounting for 6 8 % and 8 invalid cases were accountingfor 32% in the control group , while 23 effective cases were accounting for 92% and 2 invalid cases were accounting for 8 % inthe observation group. Compared with the control group, the NRS score of the observation group after treatment was significantly lowerthan that of the control group ( P 〈 0 .0 5 ) , there was significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion:Shock wave therapy hasdefinite therapeutic effect on chronic traumatic pain of upper limb.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15