机构地区:[1]南京农业大学中药材研究所,江苏南京210095
出 处:《植物资源与环境学报》2017年第1期21-29,共9页Journal of Plant Resources and Environment
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(31171486);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201310307026)
摘 要:以来自山西的菘蓝(Isatis indigotica Fort.)为实验对象,采用盆栽法研究铵态氮(NH_4^+-N)、硝态氮(NO_3^--N)和酰胺态氮[CO(NH_2)_2]的不同配比对夏播菘蓝生长,叶和根中的可溶性蛋白质及总氮含量,根中多糖含量,叶中叶绿素相对含量,以及叶中靛玉红和靛蓝、根中(R,S)-告依春的含量和积累量的影响。结果表明:各施氮处理组的单株叶干质量均高于对照(不施用氮素)组,但单株根干质量或高于或低于对照组,其中,T4[n(铵态氮)∶n(硝态氮)∶n(酰胺态氮)=25∶75∶0]处理组的单株叶和根干质量均最大,且总体上显著高于对照组及其他施氮处理组(P<0.05);而施氮处理组的根冠比均显著低于对照组。各施氮处理组叶中的可溶性蛋白质含量与对照均无显著差异,但各施氮处理组根中的可溶性蛋白质含量、叶和根中的总氮含量以及叶中的叶绿素相对含量总体上显著高于对照组,而根中的多糖含量或高于或低于对照组,其中,T6[n(铵态氮)∶n(硝态氮)∶n(酰胺态氮)=0∶75∶25]处理组根中的多糖含量和叶中的叶绿素相对含量均最高,T3[n(铵态氮)∶n(硝态氮)∶n(酰胺态氮)=50∶50∶0]处理组叶和根中的可溶性蛋白质含量均较高。各施氮处理组叶中靛玉红含量总体上显著高于对照组,多数施氮处理组叶中靛蓝含量则显著低于对照组,但各施氮处理组的单株叶中靛蓝和靛玉红积累量总体上高于对照组;其中,T2[n(铵态氮)∶n(硝态氮)∶n(酰胺态氮)=75∶25∶0]处理组叶中靛玉红含量及其单株积累量均最高,T6处理组叶中靛蓝含量最高,而单株叶中靛蓝积累量则以T3处理组最高。各施氮处理组根中(R,S)-告依春含量总体上显著低于对照组,其中,以T1[n(铵态氮)∶n(硝态氮)∶n(酰胺态氮)=100∶0∶0]处理组根中(R,S)-告依春含量最高,T4处理组单株根中(R,S)-告依春积累量最高。综合分析结果表明:按不同配比施用不同形态氮素,�Taking /satis indigotica Fort. from Shanxi as experimental object, effects of ammonium nitrogen ( NH4^+ -N) ,nitrate nitrogen ( NO3 -N) and amide nitrogen 〔 CO ( NH2 ) 2〕with different ratios on seedling growth,contents of soluble protein and total nitrogen in leaf and root,polysaccharide content in root,relative chlorophyll content in leaf, contents and accumulations of indigo and indirubin in leaf and (R, S)-epigoitrin in root of summer-planted I. indigotica were investigated by pot culture method. The results show that leaf dry weight per plant in all nitrogen treatment groups is higher than that in the control ( without applying nitrogen) group, but root dry weight per plant is higher or lower than that in the control group. In which, in T4〔几 (ammonium nitrogen) :几 (nitrate nitrogen) :几 (amide nitrogen)〕= 25:75:0〕treatment group, dry weights of leaf and root per plant are the highest, and are generally significantly higher than those in the control group and other nitrogen treatment groups ( P〈0. 05). While root/shoot ratio in all nitrogen treatment groups is significantly lower than that in the control group. There is no significant difference of soluble protein content in leaf between all nitrogen treatment groups and the control group, but soluble protein content in root, total nitrogen content in leaf and root and relative chlorophyll content in leaf in all nitrogen treatment groups are generally significantly higher than those in the control group, while polysaccharide content in root is higher or lower than that in the control group. In which, in T6 〔 ^ (ammonium nitrogen) : ^(nitrate nitrogen) : n (amide nitrogen)〕= 0 :75 :25〕 treatment group, polysaccharide content in root and relative chlorophyll content in leaf are the highest, and in T3 〔 n( ammonium nitrogen) : n (nitrate nitrogen) : n (amide nitrogen)〕= 5 0�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...