检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北省煤田地质局物测地质队,邢台054000
出 处:《地球物理学进展》2017年第2期591-595,共5页Progress in Geophysics
摘 要:通常情况下常规观测系统主要考虑的是覆盖次数问题,对于地震勘探来说这还是远远不够.我们不仅要考虑覆盖次数问题,还要考虑很多其他问题,比如地表的复杂性、观测系统的方位角、偏移距、炮检距等问题,这就要求我们用软件直观的显示出来.最近几年有人提出砖墙式观测系统,本文结合某勘探区三维地震勘探实例分别对砖墙式观测系统和常规线束状观测系统进行了观测系统设计对比,通过对其方位角、炮检距等问题的分析,得出砖墙式观测系统在方位角、炮检距等方面明显要优于常规线束状观测系统,这为观测系统优化设计提供了依据.The coverage numbers are considered to be the most important in the conventional observation system, while it is not enough for the seismic exploration. During the exploration, we consider not only coverage numbers, but also many other issues, such as the complexity of the surface, the azimuth and offset of the observation systems, it needs to display directly by the software. The brick-wall observation system is proposed in recent years, in this paper, we compared the design between this new system and the conversional system based on a 3D seismic exploration case. The results show that the brick-wall observation system is superior to conversational system by analyzing the azimuth, offset and other issues. This will provide the basis for designing the observation system.
关 键 词:参数论证 优化设计 砖墙式观测系统 宽方位角 偏移距
分 类 号:P631.4[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.193.52