检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学,辽宁大连116025
出 处:《财贸研究》2017年第3期76-84,109,共10页Finance and Trade Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"我国全面参加全球国际比较项目(ICP)的理论与实践问题研究"(13&ZD171);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"医疗服务价格规制对控制卫生费用的影响研究"(15JJD790002)
摘 要:基于CGSS 2010数据,采用Ordered Probit模型,从收入公平感知、阶级不平等感知、社会公平感知和政府机构及其工作人员公平对待四个维度对社会公平与政府信任的关系以及社会公平对不同层级政府信任的差异化影响进行实证研究。结果发现:中国政府信任存在"央强地弱"差序格局,但社会公平对政府信任的影响呈现出"央弱地强"格局;收入公平感知与社会公平感知的增加能够显著提升政府信任,阶级不平等感知的增加会显著降低政府信任,政府机构及其工作人员公平对待对地方政府信任存在显著的正向影响,但对中央政府的影响并不显著。改善经济政治等多领域的不公平状态,增强公民的公平感知,提高政府工作人员的行政执法能力,有利于缓解政府信任危机。Based on the micro data of Chinese General Social Survey in 2010( CGSS 2010), this paper uses Ordered Probit model to carry on an empirical research to find the relationship and different influence between social fairness and government trust from four perspectives of income fairness perception, class unfairness perception, social fairness perception and government staff fair treatment. The research finds that there is the trust structure of weak local and strong central government in China, however, how social fairness influence on the government trust is completely opposite. Income fairness perception and social fairness perception can enhance government trust significantly, however, class unfairness perception has a significantly negative effect on government trust. Government staff fair treatment impacts on the local government trust positively, while there is no significant impact on central government. Changing unfair situation of many areas such as political economy, enhancing citizens' fairness perception, and improving government trust help ease the crisis of government trust.
分 类 号:D630.1[政治法律—政治学] C913.9[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117