隐性就业歧视的现代性审视及其软法治理  

Modernity of Recessive Employment Discrimination and Its Soft Law Governance

作　　者：郑春燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]阜阳师范学院政法学院,安徽阜阳236037

出　　处：《阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期107-111,共5页Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：安徽省农民工研究中心委托专项重点课题"农民工隐性就业歧视法律规则"(2013NMG01ZD);2016安徽省青年学者境外访学重点项目

摘　　要：隐性就业歧视的产生,是现代工具理性暴政的结果,面对隐性就业歧视传统硬法束手无策,当前此类问题的解决,主要是通过行政手段来维护弱势群体的利益。但是,这与我国法治中国建设中政府依法行政及经济社会领域的去行政化呼声相违和,且成效有限。近年来,软法理论因在社会治理中发挥独特作用,越来越引起国人的关注,但由于软法理论是一种新兴理论,其理论仍在发展之中,所以有人质疑其效力的真实性。本文在为软法效力证成的同时,指出软法在规制隐性就业歧视时的合理性,进一步为软法治理隐性就业歧视问题提供路径探索和理论奠基,并借鉴中国独特的礼法结合与重"和谐"的法律文化传统,使软法在中国社会治理中盛开生命之花。Recessive employment discrimination has its modernity, which is the result of rational tyranny. Modem tools to cope with traditional recessive employment discrimination are not effective. The solution of this problem mainly relies upon administrative means to maintain the social vulnerable groups--groups of workers （many migrant workers）. But this is contradictory to ＂the administration according to law＂ in constructing Chinese government under the role of law, and digitization in the field of economic and social security administration, and the effect is limited. Soft law theory in recent years played a unique role in the social governance, and attracted more and more attention. But since soft law theory is a new, and still in development, there are some doubts about its effectiveness. The paper supports the effectiveness of soft law governance and provides some theoretical foundation for soft law in governing recessive employment discrimination by drawing some insights from the unique ＂harmony＂ characteristics of the Chinese legal culture tradition, so as to bring soft law into full play in social governance in China.

关 键 词：隐性就业歧视 现代性审视 软法治理 

分 类 号：B90[哲学宗教—宗教学]