再论法眼宗初祖文益禅师于漳州参桂琛而得法  

A Further Discussion on the Methodology of the Wenyi Master from Guichen Master in Zhangzhou

作　　者：谢重光[1] Xie Chongguang(College of Social Development of Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou Fujian,35000)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学社会历史学院,福建福州350008

出　　处：《地方文化研究》2016年第6期71-77,共7页Local Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"晚明佛教改革与近代人间佛教研究"(项目批准编号:13BZJ011)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：禅宗法眼宗初祖文益禅师参禅得法之源是禅宗史中的重要问题,本文就文益禅师在漳州参桂琛禅师而得法的观点作了进一步申论。笔者首先就《禅林僧宝传》《景德传灯录》与《宋高僧传》的史料价值作了深入的比较,指出《宋高僧传》的记载常有疏误,或记事隐晦不明,而《禅林僧宝传》别有史料来源,其史料价值不容轻易否定;进而引证《祖堂集》《佛祖纲目》《宗统编年》等佛教文献,以及正德《漳州府志》等方志资料,充分证明漳州牧王公所建地藏院不在福州,而是在漳州。对于王荣国先生提出的质疑或新"证据"也一一作了剖析、回应,重申文益禅师在漳州参桂琛得法的历史公案无法推翻。The source of Zen Buddhism is the important problem in the history of Zen Buddhism. This paper makes a further application on the view of Zen Master in Zhangzhou. First of all, on the Zen Buddhism Monk Po Chuan, Jingde Chuanzhuan Recorded and Song Monk Biography of the historical value of the in-depth comparison, pointed out that ＂Song monk biography＂ records often mistakes, or memorable, and Zen Monk Treasure Do not have the source of historical data, the value of historical data can not be easily denied. And then cited the Ancestral Hall, Buddha Outline, Ances- tral Chronology and other Buddhist literature, as well as Zhengde Zhangrhou Fuzhi and other local information, fully proved Zhangzhou Dizang temple did not build the community in Fuzhou, in Zhangzhou. The For Wang Rongguo questioned or new ＂evidence＂ also made an analysis, responded, reiterated that Wen Yi zen master in Zhangzhou Study Guichen historical history can not be overturned.

关 键 词：法眼宗 文益 桂琛 地藏院 漳州 

分 类 号：B946.5[哲学宗教—宗教学]