知识产权法定主义及其缓和——兼对《民法总则》第123条条文的分析  

Intellectual Property Legalism and Its Mitigation: Analysis on IP Article of General Provisions of Civil Law

作　　者：易继明[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学 [2]北京大学国际知识产权研究中心 [3]国家知识产权局国家知识产权战略实施(北京大学)研究基地

出　　处：《知识产权》2017年第5期3-11,共9页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：《民法总则》第123条通过列举知识产权客体的方式,对知识产权进行了概括性定义。该条确立了知识产权类型的"7+N"模式,即著作权、专利权、商标权、地理标志权、商业秘密权、集成电路布图设计权、植物新品种权这7种权利,再加上代表"N"的兜底款项。不过,这一兜底款项采取严格的法定主义,排除了行政性法规、地方性法规、司法解释和判例创设新的知识产权类型。因此,司法实践中要进行扩张性立法解释,并加强知识产权立法工作,不断完善知识产权权利体系。Article 123 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law provides a general definition of intellectual property rights by enumerating the objects. This article establishes the t67 ＋ 1 ST 5 model of intellectual property rights, namely, copyright, patent right, trademark right, geographical indication right, trade secret right, integrated circuit layout design right, new plant variety right as well as miscellaneous provision represented byHowever, this miscellaneous provision takes strict legalism, excluding the administrative regulations, local regulations, judicial interpretation and cases to create new types of intellectual property. Therefore, we need to carry out expansionary legislative interpretation injudicial practice, strengthen the legislative work of intellectual property rights, and constantly improve the system of intellectual property rights.

关 键 词：《民法总则》第123条 知识产权定义 知识产权类型 法定主义 规制缓和 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]