检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜颖[1] 马良[1] 白杨[1] 刘善江[1,2]
机构地区:[1]北京市农林科学院植物营养与资源研究所 [2]农产品产地环境监测北京市重点实验室
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2017年第6期1128-1130,共3页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20151205);农产品质量与农田环境基础数据平台建设项目(KJCX20140302)
摘 要:有机肥料试样经硫酸和过氧化氢消煮后过滤,过滤液分别用火焰光度法和ICP-OES法测定。结果表明,火焰光度法与ICP-OES法均能得到较好的试验结果,火焰光度法的测定值高于ICP-OES法,二者相对相差小于30%,火焰光度法和ICP-OES法的回收率分别为101.0%和99.0%,RSD分别为1.0%和0.3%,说明两种方法测定全钠具有较好的准确度和精密度,而ICP-OES法对批量样品的检测更具优势。Organic fertilizer samples were digested by sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide. Then filtrate were determinate by flame photometer and ICP-OES respectively. The results showed that flame photometer and ICP-OES could can get a better test results, Flame photometer measurement value is higher than ICP-OES method, the results of the relative difference be-tween the two methods was not more than 30%. The recovery rate of the two methods which was flame photometer and ICP-OES were 101.0% and 99.0%, RSD values were 1.0% and 0.3% respectively. Comparing the measured results showed that both methods had good accuracy and precision. The ICP-OES method had more advantages for the detection of bulk samples.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229