澳大利亚与我国煤炭资源储量评估规则对比研究  

Acomparative study on estimation and evaluation rules of coal resource and coal reserve in Australia and China

作　　者：王猛[1] 汤家轩[1] 倪斌[2] Wang Meng Tang Jiaxuan Ni Bin(Consulting Center of China National Coal Association, Dongcheng, Beijing 100013,China China National Administration of Coal Geology, Haidian, Beijing 100038, China)

机构地区：[1]中国煤炭工业协会咨询中心,北京市东城区100013 [2]中国煤炭地质总局,北京市海淀区100038

出　　处：《中国煤炭》2017年第5期137-140,共4页China Coal

基　　金：国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目(国家专项)资助项目(国土资厅函[2015]1151号)

摘　　要：在研究我国与澳大利亚矿业行业、企业及矿业资本市场的基础上,从煤炭资源储量评估基础、专业人员、依据、范围要求和结果使用方向五个方面分析,探讨了我国与澳大利亚煤炭资源储量评估规则的异同。结果表明澳大利亚矿业企业选择包括胜任人在内的专业人员以行业协会发布实践指南等为依据,估算3级资源量,根据企业需要估算2级储量或其他类别储量。我国要求有资质的单位根据相应标准规范估算16种资源储量。研究成果为我国煤炭资源储量评估规则完善和我国矿业企业在澳大利亚进行煤炭资源勘查投资提供了借鉴。Basing upon research of mining industry, mining enterprises and disclosure rules of mining capital market, the authors analyzed differences rules of coal reserves, estimation and evaluation between China and Australia from perspectives of basis, professional people, foundation, range and results using. The results showed that the professional people including competent people estimated 3 kinds of resources basing upon practice guidelines which published by industry association and the professional people also estimated 2 kinds of reserves and other reserves based on enterprises＇ demands in Australia. The qualified companies must estimate 16 kinds of resources and reserves under the guidelines of standards in China. The conclusions provided the reference on improving the rules of China and exploration and investigation for Chinese mining companies in Australia.

关 键 词：评估规则 实践指南 煤炭资源储量 中国 澳大利亚 

分 类 号：TD163.16[矿业工程—矿山地质测量]