检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学行政学院国际政治系 [2]同济大学中国战略研究院
出 处:《教学与研究》2017年第5期104-112,共9页Teaching and Research
基 金:吉林大学青年师生学科交叉培育项目"多元启发理论与对外政策决策研究"(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助);吉林大学哲学社会科学研究重大课题培育项目"国际秩序变革与中国和平发展"(项目号:2015ZDPY18)的阶段性成果
摘 要:近年来,多元启发理论发展趋势较为迅猛,且已得到大量研究的证实。多元启发理论在认知理论和理性选择理论之间构建了一座桥梁,它认为对外政策决策包含两个加工阶段。第一阶段以维度加工为基础,不满足非补偿性政治维度阈限的方案将被删除;第二阶段以方案加工为基础,对剩余方案进行理性分析,力求将结果的利益最大化,风险最小化。运用多元启发理论开展对外政策决策的研究主要体现在理论应用和理论验证两方面。回顾相关研究发现,多元启发理论过于强调国内政治限制,未来的研究不应忽视决策个体、决策背景、决策任务三方面因素及彼此间的互动。In recent years, the development trend of poliheuristic theory is relatively rapid, and has been confirmed by numerous empirical studies. Poliheuristic theory constructs a bridge between the cognitive theory and rational choice theory, and postulates that foreign policy decision contains two processing stages. The first stage is a dimension-based processing, alternatives which do not meet the noncompensatory political dimension threshold will be deleted; the second stage is a alternative-based processing, use rational analysis for the survival options, and in at- tempt to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Applying poliheuristic theory to study decision of foreign policy is mainly reflected in two aspects of theoretical application and theoretical validation. By reviewing the relevant studies, we found that poliheuristic theory emphasizes the domestic political constraints too much, the difference of decision makers, decision conditions and properties of decision tasks, these three factors should not be ignored in the future study, the interac- tion between them should also be considered.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49