收入门槛、相对剥夺与老年人幸福感  

Income Threshold,Relative Deprivation and Happiness of the Aged

作　　者：白志远[1] 亓寿伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院

出　　处：《财贸经济》2017年第5期20-33,共14页Finance & Trade Economics

基　　金：教育部青年基金项目"贫困与富裕阶层代际传递路径及对策研究(项目批准号:13YJC840030)"的资助;国家自然科学基金"收入不平等代际传递:估计偏误;传递机制与干预仿真(项目批准号:71403297)"的资助

摘　　要：本文利用我国东、中、西部12个省份的城镇和农村3970名55岁以上老年人微观调查数据,首次考察了在城乡分割和区域发展差异背景下老年人群体收入与幸福感的关系。研究结果表明:绝对收入水平对主观幸福感有显著的正向影响,但是在经济发达的东部地区不显著;绝对收入对幸福感的影响不仅具有直接效应,而且还通过健康和娱乐等途径产生间接效应;除了城镇地区,相对收入对老年人主观幸福感的作用都显著;不同收入阶层老年人的幸福感存在显著的差异,且中西部和农村地区老年人从"不幸福"到"幸福"的收入转折点低于东部和城镇地区。因此,增加收入有利于提高我国老年人的幸福感水平,且应当切实提高农村和中西部地区老年人的收入保障水平。Based on the micro-survey data of 3970 the elderly with age over 55 from urban and rural in twelve provinces, this paper examines the impact of income on the elderly subjective well-being （SWB） with urban-rural segmentation and regional differences. The results show that income has positive effect on the SWB of the elderly living in urban and eastern, but not for the east regionsl the impact of absolute income on well-being dose not only have direct effect, but also through indirect effects of health and recreation. The relative income had significant effect on the SWB of the elderly but for urban areas. There is significant difference in different levels of income, and the income change point from ＂unhappiness＂ to ＂happiness＂ of the elderly living in the rural and the Midwest regions is lower than the urban and eastern. Therefore, to improve the well-being of older persons in China, the key points are that increasing income of the elderly, and improving the income guarantee level of the elderly in the rural areas and the Midwest region.

关 键 词：主观幸福感 绝对收入 相对收入 老年人幸福 

分 类 号：D669.6[政治法律—政治学] F126[政治法律—中外政治制度]