检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包大鹏[1] 何鑫[1] 庞秀明[1] 韩鹏[1] BAO Da-peng HE Xin PANG Xiu-ming HAN Peng(The Second Ajfiliated Hospital of Heilong/iang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin 150001, China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2017年第5期546-549,共4页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察电针配合鼻腔冲洗治疗上气道咳嗽综合征(UACS)的临床疗效。方法将114例UACS患者随机分为3组,每组38例。A组采用针刺加疏密波电刺激治疗,B组采用双黄连鼻腔给药治疗,C组采用上述两种方法同时应用治疗,比较3组的临床疗效。结果 A组、B组、C组总有效率分别为84.2%、73.7%、94.7%,C组总有效率与A组和B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论电针配合鼻腔冲洗方法治疗UACS患者疗效明显优于单纯电针或鼻腔冲洗治疗。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture plus nasal irrigation in treating upper airway cough syndrome (UACS).Method A total of 114 UACS patients were randomized into 3 groups, 38 cases in each group. Group A was treated with acupuncture plus electrical stimulation with sparse-dense wave, group B was intervened by nasal irrigation with Shuang Huang Lian, and group C was treated with the two methods together. The clinical efficacies of the three groups were compared.Result The total effective rates were respectively 84.2%, 73.7% and 94.7% in group A, group B and group C. The total effective rate of group C was significantly different from that of group A and group B (P〈0.05).Conclusion Electroacupuncture plus nasal irrigation can produce a more significant therapeutic efficacy compared to electroacupuncture or nasal irrigation alone.
关 键 词:针刺疗法 上气道咳嗽综合征 咳嗽 慢性 电针 鼻腔冲洗
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.199.14