鲁迅与左翼:理解的障碍  

Lu Xun and the Left-wing: Barriers of Understanding

作　　者：张宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学中国语言文化学院,广州510420

出　　处：《中州大学学报》2017年第1期9-14,共6页Journal of Zhongzhou University

摘　　要："时代转换"构成了今日理解鲁迅和20世纪30年代左翼文化的障碍,但理解鲁迅的障碍远不止于此,还有知识者自身的思维局限,其中之一是从一个被否定的时代中又无意识继承下来的"正/邪""天使/魔鬼"的历史二分法。此外,还包括过于依赖既有理论、概念"组合"对象,而不是依其自身逻辑"进入"对象,于是,鲁迅"那些化不掉的剩余物",历史的具体性、丰富性和复杂性,便都在研究中烟消云散了。比如"‘进入’历史"方法中的那种痛苦的"逼入"性质,便被置换为休闲式的"走入"性质;对"第三种人"论争事件,也会习惯地停留于字面义,而未能进入那真正的历史伦理学及今日相似处境;"两个口号"论争,也会被视为半斤八两,而无力辨析鲁迅留下的另一种左翼文化思路;胡风的创作论和"典型论",自然更会因话语的陈旧,而无法意识到其内在于历史的那种痛苦和智慧,自然也不会谦卑地从中看到先驱者的身影……Nowadays, “ the transition of the eras” has become one of the main obstacles of understanding Lu Xun and the left - wing Cultural Movement in the 1930s. Meanwhile, the cognitive limitation of the intellectual is another one,such as the thinking mode of binary opposition upright and evil” , “angel and devil” ？ Furthermore, they depend too much on the established theories and concepts, not in accordance with their own logic “ into” the object. So, “ Lu Xun ’s ideas that cannot be understood” ,the concreteness,richness and complexity of the history are all swept away in the study. The approaches to history are likewise changed from the painful u being compelled into” to the casual “wandering into”（Study of Diary of the Madman） ; the issue of “The Third Category Persons” tends to be satisfied literally instead of probing a real historical ethics and a realistic portrait; the controversy of “Two Slogan” is equally pale to differentiate another left - wing cultural thought of LU Xun ; “The Writing Theory” and “Type Theory” of HU Feng thus, for their antiquated expounding, can, t make sense of the pain and wisdomwith historical depth, nor view the forerunners from the humble eyes...

关 键 词：鲁迅 左翼 理解 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]