隐私权与一般人格权关系探讨  

The Research on the Relationship between the General Personality Right and the Privacy Right

作　　者：马特[1] Ma Te

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《创新》2017年第3期81-91,共11页Innovation

基　　金：霍英东青年教师基金项目"生命权的伦理冲突和制度保障"(121086)

摘　　要：随着社会发展,隐私权在各国判例和学说的推动下逐渐具有一般人格权的性质。隐私权与一般人格权具有同质性,在功能上都呈现相似性,各国往往在实证法上设置其中一项。针对一般人格权的否定说,我国应当坚持一般人格权与具体人格权二元并立的双层人格权结构,但需明确二者之间的关系。在我国现行制度下,隐私权与一般人格权并存,隐私权不是一般人格权,但同为"框架性权利",发挥着赋予法官自由裁量权的作用。With the development of society, the nature of the privacy right has been similar to the general personality right because of the precedents and theories. Each state usually chooses one between the privacy right and the general personality right, because they are similar in function. China should keep the dual personality right structure with the coexistence of the general personality right and specific personality right yet defining their relationship. In China＇s current system, the privacy right and the general personality right coexist. But the privacy right is not the general personality right yet they are within the same framework of right, giving the judges＇ discretion power.

关 键 词：隐私权 一般人格权 具体人格权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]