检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《学习与探索》2017年第2期93-97,共5页Study & Exploration
摘 要:供给学派及供给侧结构性改革在时代背景、学理基础、利益代表及政策主张等方面均有重大的不同。深入推进供给侧结构性改革是党中央适应和引领经济发展新常态而做出的战略调整,是加快全面建成小康社会的必然要求。在推进供给侧结构性改革过程中,对于国有企业、产能过剩、税制结构、宏观调控手段、政府与市场关系等方面的问题,不能将供给侧结构性改革视为供给学派的翻版,以供给学派的政策主张解决上述问题,而应该立足于中国经济社会所面临的实际情况,采取相应的措施。There are lots of significant differences between supply school and supply side structural reform,especially in background,academic foundation,interest representatives and policy advocates et al.. Deepening the structural reform of the supply side is not only the strategic adjustment made by the Party Central Committee to adapt and lead the new normal of economic development,but also an inevitable requirement to accelerate the building of a well-off society in an all-round way. In the process of promoting the structural reform of supply side,neither could we regard the structural reform of supply side as a replica of the supply school,nor could we use policy proposition of the supply school to solve the problems of state-owned enterprises reform,overcapacity,tax structure,macro-control,government-market relations and so on. What we are supposed to do is to take appropriate measures based on the actual situation facing China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170