检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋寅卯[1] 王蓬[1] 曹卫锋[1] Song Yinmao Wang Peng Cao Weifeng(College of Electric Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Indus try,Zhengzhou 450002, Chin)
机构地区:[1]郑州轻工业学院电气信息工程学院,河南郑州450002
出 处:《微型机与应用》2017年第10期11-14,共4页Microcomputer & Its Applications
摘 要:为解决两轮自平衡车因不同用户身高体重的差异造成系统模型不准确而带来控制器对系统控制稳定性能差的问题,将自抗扰控制技术运用到两轮自平衡车运动平衡控制中。首先采用拉格朗日方法建立两轮自平衡车动力学模型,然后针对系统的特性推导出实现两轮平衡车自平衡控制的自抗扰控制器控制律。最后,搭建两轮自平衡车控制系统的Simulink仿真平台,分别采用线性自抗扰控制和经典自抗扰控制方法进行了试验比较。试验结果表明:与经典自抗扰控制器相比,新的自抗扰控制器能够较好地适应身高体重变化的环境,较好地自主达到稳定运行状态。In order to solve the problem that the stability of two-wheeled self-balancing vehicles is poor because of different height and weightbetween diferent controllers so that the system model is not accurate, the active disturbance two-wheeled self-balancing vehicle movement balance control. First of all, two-wheeled self-balancing vehicle dynamics model is establishedwith the Lagrange algorithm. Then the control law of tlie active disturbances rejection controller is derived from the characteristics of the systemachieving two-wheeled balancing vehicle balance. Finaiy, the Simulink simulation platform of two-wheeled self-lDalancing vehicle control sys-tem is built and the classical auto-disturbance rejection control and the active disturbance rejection control metliods adopted are compared. The application results show that compared with the classical auto-disturbance rejection controller, the ADRC could better adapt the height and weight changing environment, which can reach independently a steady running state.
关 键 词:自平衡车 模型不准确 自抗扰控制 Simulink仿真平台
分 类 号:TP368.1[自动化与计算机技术—计算机系统结构]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.112.142