检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心
出 处:《城市问题》2017年第5期73-80,共8页Urban Problems
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71203145)
摘 要:一般认为,合作在亲缘之间或在小规模、小范围群体内部相对容易实现,而群体规模越大,合作的集体行动越难发生。利用普莱斯方程和多层选择模型,将个体的利他程度和理性程度进行了异质性区分,比较个体在合作治理集体行动中发生的广义效用,并以此分析了合作治理的集体行动发生的条件。结果发现,拥有较高平均适应性的群体更容易形成、维持合作和集体行动。在上述分析的基础上,以深圳西头新村异质性业主群体围绕公共品合作治理的集体行动为案例,分析了大城市异质性群体自发合作治理得以发生和维持的机制。It is commonly believed that cooperation is easily realized within kinship organizations,or in a small amount of people in a limited geographic location. Otherwise,cooperation at large scale is more difficult to realize. This essay attempts to compare individual cooperation's rational degree of individual heterogeneity distinction generalized utility( costs and benefits)to seek cooperative governance conditions,based on multi-selection model Price Equation and the degree of altruism and make. The results show that the group which have higher average fitness will more easily to form and keep cooperation and collective action. Based on the above analysis,with the case of collective good cooperative governance of Xitou New Village of Shenzhen City,this essay analyzes the mechanisms of forming and keeping spontaneous cooperative governance in heterogeneous group in big cities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225