检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董素霞[1]
机构地区:[1]河南安阳地区医院妇产科,河南安阳455000
出 处:《临床研究》2017年第4期158-159,共2页Clinical Research
摘 要:目的探讨经动脉内急诊栓塞治疗妇产科继发出血性患者的护理效果.方法选择我院妇产科收治的继发性出血患者60例,根据护理方式分组,对照组(30例)采用常规护理,观察组(30例)用常规护理+综合护理干预,比较两组患者护理干预前后SAS、SDS、VAS评分以及并发症发生情况.结果护理干预后,观察组患者SAS、SDS、VAS评分优于对照组(P〈0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论经动脉内栓塞(急诊)治疗的妇产科继发性出血患者采用系统的综合护理干预,效果显著,值得推广应用.Objective To investigate the nursing effect of patients with secondary obstetrics and gynecology hemorrhage by emergency intra arterial embolization. Methods Sixty cases of secondary obstetrics and gynecology hemorrhage patients admitted in our hospital were selected. All the patients were divided into control group and observation group according to different nursing methods, with 30 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group accepted comprehensive nursing on the basis of routine nursing. The SAS, SDS and VAS scores before and after nursing intervention and complications of the two groups were compared. Results After nursing intervention, the SAS, SDS and VAS scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group ( P〈0.05). The complication rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P 〈0.05). Conclusion Systematic comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with secondary obstetrics and gynecology hemorrhage by emergency intra arterial embolization has significant clinical effect, which is worthy of popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3