检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学医学人文研究院,北京100191 [2]北京大学公共卫生学院全球卫生系,北京100191
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2017年第9期976-984,共9页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:在全球卫生治理中,如何平衡药品研发技术创新与药品可及性之间的问题由来已久,发达国家和发展中国家在这一议题上的利益界定与谈判策略分歧也逐渐加大。本文通过分析弹性条款以及发达国家与发展中国家持有不同立场,认为中国在参与全球卫生治理中,充分使用《与贸易相关的知识产权协定》(TRIPS协议)下的弹性条款,维护发展中国家的利益,是必要的选择。In global health governance, the balance between accessibility to essential medicines and the research and development of pharmaceuticals has been a long-standing issue. Because of the diverged national interests, the developed and developing countries pursue different strategies in their negotiations at various global health governance platforms. This study examines the flexible clauses in the TRIPS agreement and the different standpoints of both developed and developing countries, and proposes that China should take full advantage of the flexible clauses in its global health governance to protect the interests of developing countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229