立象以尽意——论当代中国仿古建筑中意的缺失  

Using Symbol to Express Meaning:Discussion on Deficiency of Meaning in Chinese Pseudo-classic Architecture

作　　者：刘思捷[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学城市设计学院

出　　处：《华中建筑》2017年第4期12-15,共4页Huazhong Architecture

摘　　要：意与象源自《周易》。"见乃谓之象",建筑之象是其形式,建筑之意是建筑的精神,也是象的根源。文章指出,当代中国仿古建筑意的缺失主要在于以钢筋混凝土简单模仿古建筑木构形式,由于材料与形式的失衡使仿古建筑缺乏变化、形式单一。追根溯源,《周易》是中国古建筑思想之源。变化是《周易》的核心思想,书中指出"穷则变,变则通,通则久"。传承传统建筑文化的立足点不是形式,而是传统技术与现代技术的变化与平衡,以及传统文化与现代思想的融合与互补。Meaning（Yi） and symbol（Xiang） originated from the Book of Changes（Zhou Yi）. ＂What one sees is symbol＂ , the form of architecture is symbol, and the spirit of architecture is meaning and also the origin of symbol. In this article we point out the deficiency of meaning in Chinese pseudo-classic architecture lies in imitation of wooden structure by reinforced concrete. The unbalance of material and form results in lack of variety. The Book of Changes has close relationship with Chinese traditional architecture while tracing the source. Change is the core concept of the book which also indicates only by sublimating change to mastery can works long exists. The inheritance of traditional architectural culture should be based on variation and balance of traditional and modem technology, as well as fusion and complement of traditional and modem culture, rather than form merely.

关 键 词：意 象 仿古建筑 传统技术 

分 类 号：TU-0[建筑科学—建筑理论]