检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付武良[1] 张友来[1] 刘春江[1] 易剑锋[1] 肖旭[1] 江冬连
机构地区:[1]长沙医学院附属株洲市三三一医院急诊科,湖南株洲412002
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2017年第8期114-116,共3页China Journal of Modern Medicine
基 金:湖南省株洲市2016年第二批科技指导性计划-15
摘 要:目的探讨夹舌牵引气管插管法与普通气管插管法在急诊危重病患者气管插管的效果和优势。方法将需要气管插管的160例急诊患者随机分为试验组与对照组,试验组采用夹舌牵引气管插管法进行气管插管,对照组采用普通气管插管法进行气管插管。同时记录两组气管插管时间、1次成功率、插管次数及不良反应情况。结果试验组气管插管时间、插管次数和不良反应方面少于对照组,1次成功率则高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.023)。结论夹舌牵引气管插管法能短时间内建立人工气道,提高一次性气管插管成功率,并减少插管过程中的不良反应。Objective To study the advantage of tongue traction in endotraeheal intubation method in patients of emergency critical care. Methods 160 emergency patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group adopted tongue traction for endotracheal intubation and the control group with normal methods. The time of the two groups for endotracheal intubation, the success rate, the number of intubation and adverse reactions were recorded and compared. Results The endotracheal intubation time, number of intnbation and adverse reactions statistically significant (P = 0.023). Conclusions intubation establishs artificial airway in a short were less in the experimental group. The differences were The method of the clip tongue traction for endotracheal period of time, improves the one-time success rate and reduces the adverse reaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62