检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周忠泉[1] 邓士兵 李建军[2] 颜红兵[2] 易绪英[1] 杨沙宁[1] 杨学新[1] 金立军[1]
机构地区:[1]荆州市第一人民医院(长江大学附属第一医院)心内科,434000 [2]北京阜外医院冠心病中心
出 处:《心肺血管病杂志》2017年第4期243-246,共4页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
摘 要:目的:评价替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷改善急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)术后冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的临床疗效。方法:选择2014年1月至2016年6月,接受PCI手术的ACS患者45例,随机分为替格瑞洛组22例和氯吡格雷组23例,分别在PCI术前12h内给予替格瑞洛片180mg和氯吡格雷片600mg口服,采用术前和术后微循环阻力指数(IMR)、血流储备分数(FFR)和冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)进行微循环功能评价。结果:45例患者均顺利完成手术,PCI术前两组FFR、IMR和CFR组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);以疗前数值为协变量,替格瑞洛组疗后IMR、CFR优于氯吡格雷组(P<0.05),而FFR组间比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:PCI术前口服替格瑞洛改善冠状动脉微循环功能障碍的效果优于氯吡格雷。Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel for coronary microvascular dysfunction improving after percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) in acute coronary syndromes ( ACS ). Methods: From January 2014 to June 2016, 45 patients with ACS undergoing PCI were randomly divided into tigrielol group (n = 22) and clopidogrel group (n = 23 ). Before and after PCI, 180 mg of tegrelloxil tablets and 600 mg of clopidogrel tablets were administrated orally. Index of microcirculatory resistance ( IMR), flow re- serve fraction (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were evaluated for microvascular. Results: 45 patients completed the operation successfully. Before treatment, there were no significant differences in FFR, IMR and CFR between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). IMR, CFR was superior to clopidogrel group ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but there was no significant difference in FFR between two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion: The effect of ticagrelor for coronary microcirculation dysfunction improvement is better than that clopidogrel.
关 键 词:急性冠状动脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入术 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 微循环障碍
分 类 号:R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.59