检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京邮电大学 [2]南京大学社会保障研究中心
出 处:《社会政策研究》2017年第2期3-13,共11页Social Policy Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目:社会服务管理体制改革与社会管理创新(12&ZD063)资助
摘 要:20世纪80年代初,美国关于"福利依赖"问题的讨论成为舆论关注的焦点,逐步形成了依赖文化理论、制度危机理论和后工业社会新风险理论三种理论解释。近年来,在我国低保制度中,同样出现了关于"福利依赖"问题的讨论。通过对比美国"福利依赖者"与我国城市低保中处于劳动年龄、具有劳动能力的受助者,发现两者在福利动态和工作逻辑方面皆不相同,为此本文提出了"非典型福利依赖"新概念,并引入生命历程视角,建立了"非典型福利依赖"新的解释框架及其政策建议。In the early 1980' s, the controversy of welfare dependency in American social assistance system gain attention from the public. Three theories named dependency culture, institutional crisis and new risks in post-lndustrial society formed to explain the welfare dependency phenomenon. Nowadays, the debate of welfare dependency welfare dynamic and has risen in the Minimum Subsistence work logic between the recipients from Guarantee System as well. Through comparing U.S. and China, this paper finds that Chinese working age recipients with working ability are different from the American recipients and their behavior of receiving social assistance could be called the atypical welfare dependency. This paper applies the life course theory and tries to create a new theory model to give relevant social policy reform suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229