检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何俊志[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广州市510275 [2]中山大学粤港澳发展研究院,广州市510275
出 处:《政治学研究》2017年第2期52-63,共12页CASS Journal of Political Science
摘 要:中国人民主价值观的各种调查结果一直存在着矛盾和分歧。文献分析表明,先前调查在民主价值观的测量方式上有两个主要问题:一是假定中国人拥有某种同质性的民主价值观,并以由当代西方主流民主理论为依据而发展出的测量手段进行测量;二是将对民主的理解等同于对民主的支持。依据古典和现代民主理论,结合中国政治传统,通过重新设计测量方式,并以地方官员这一特殊群体为样本,本文研究发现:在中国地方官员中存在着直接民主、代议民主和为民做主3种纯粹类型和4种混合类型的民主价值观。同时,对民主的理解与对民主的支持之间,并不存在显著关联。应该用一套复合的民主价值观来更好地理解中国地方官员的民主价值观。The main problems of the measurement about Chinese people's democratic value fasten on two points: most survey conductors suppose that there exist a homogenized democratic value among Chinese people,thus they use the standard from the western countries to measure the Chinese people;they also equal the understanding of democracy to the support of democracy. Combining the classic and modern democratic theories with China's political tradition,by renewing the measurement methods,and based on a distractive dataset from China's local government official groups,this paper finds that there exist three types of pure and four types of blended democratic values among China's local government officials. And their understanding of democracy is different from their support of democracy. The democratic value among China's local government officials should be generalized as a set of compound democratic values.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94