检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学热能工程系,热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室,北京100084
出 处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2017年第5期511-515,共5页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
摘 要:该文利用商业软件ANSYS-CFX对圆管中的脉动湍流进行了大涡模拟,分析了脉动流的减阻特性和总能耗。文中的脉动流算例包括稳态流主控和振荡流主控两种流态。结果表明:脉动流通过叠加适合的振荡流来改变稳态流的边界层特性,脉动幅值为5.5时得到最佳减阻率为25%;当脉动流的流态由振荡流主控且振荡流分量的边界层为层流时,减阻效果较好;简单正弦形式脉动流的总能耗高于相应的稳态流。Large eddy simulations were conducted for turbulent pulsating flows using the commercial solver ANSYS-CFX. The drag reduction and the total energy consumption for pulsating flows were analyzed. The simulations included current dominated and wave dominated pulsating flows. The boundary layer characteristics of the current flow were affected by the superposition of the wave flow. The best drag reduction in the pulsating flows gave a 25% drag reduction when the non-dimensional pulsating amplitude was 5.5. The analysis indicates that the drag reduction is optimized when the pulsating flow is wave dominated and the wave boundary layer is laminar. Pulsating flows with simple sinusoidal pulsating patterns consume much more energy than steady flows.
分 类 号:TK01[动力工程及工程热物理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.127.79