检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,北京100082 [2]万若<北京>环境工程技术有限公司,北京100083 [3]北京市大兴区水环境监测中心,北京102600
出 处:《中国给水排水》2017年第10期37-40,共4页China Water & Wastewater
摘 要:排水系统是综合管廊工程不可缺少的部分,综合管廊内排水对象是管廊内渗漏水及管道检修放空水,其特点是水量小且不定、难以准确计算。目前综合管廊常规排水方式是通过集水坑收集并由潜污泵提升排出,存在设备多、排水点分散及施工难度较大等问题。针对上述问题并结合真空排水系统的优点,以实际工程为例,对常规排水系统和真空排水系统进行了多方面分析比较,研究表明真空排水系统既可满足综合管廊内排水要求,又可显著降低工程投资和施工难度,工程效果和经济效益良好。The drainage system is necessary in utility tunnel project. The drainage water of the utility tunnel consists of leakage water from the pipelines and emptying water produced during pipeline maintenance. The flow of drainage water is small, uncertain, and hard to calculate. At present, the conventional drainage is collected by sump pits and pumped out by submersible sewage pumps. The problem existed in the conventional drainage mode is necessary of more facilities, scattered drainage points and difficulty in construction. With regard to the issues above and the advantages of vacuum wastewater system, the contrast between vacuum and conventional drainage system has been conducted on basis of the real project. The results showed that vacuum drainage system not only met the drainage requirements of utility tunnel, but also reduced project investment and construction difficulty. Therefore, the favorable and economic benefit can be achieved when vacuum drainage system is applied to utility tunnel.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229