检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]海军潜艇学院,山东青岛266100
出 处:《计算机仿真》2017年第5期1-6,共6页Computer Simulation
摘 要:在传统的声纳系统均采用声压水听器构成阵列模型对目标进行探测跟踪时,由于声压直线阵存在目标"左右舷模糊"问题,为准确估计目标真实方位,分析了包括直线阵、圆阵、十字阵和Y形阵在内的四种常见阵形的常规波束形成方法,并通过仿真比较了不同阵形对声纳目标的跟踪定位性能。结果表明,除直线阵会产生左右舷模糊目标外,其余阵形均可确认目标真实方位,且圆阵效果最好,十字阵效果最差。但直线阵空间增益大,波束宽度窄,在非端射方位区域,探测距离和方位分辨力均优于其它阵形。The traditional sonar system, that is composed of pressure hydrophone used to be line array, can pro- cure target bearing and track the target by the array signal processing method. However, the biggest problem of line array is the left-right ambiguity. For this, the conventional beam forming methods of four arrays that include line ar- ray, circular array, cross array and Y-like array are analyzed, and the performance of sonar target tracking and loca- ting based on different array is compared by simulating. The simulation results show that all but line array can esti- mate the targets direction, and the circular array is the best, while the cross array is the worst. Line array has high spatial gain and narrow beam width, and on the non-end-fire area, its detection range and azimuth resolution are better than other arrays.
分 类 号:TN911[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28