“共犯正犯化”立法质疑——以帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的增设为视角  

Skepticism on the Legislation of Accomplice Becoming Principal Offender: A Perspective of the Crime of Helping Cybercrime

作　　者：王兵兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2017年第1期98-106,共9页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

摘　　要：网络犯罪的不断蔓延趋势引发了人们关于网络安全的担忧,"共犯正犯化"立法模式的扩张正是社会要求周延保护法益的结果。但是,"共犯正犯化"赖以存在的理论根基包括共犯独立性说、行为无价值二元论以及积极的一般预防理论都有着难以自圆其说的矛盾与缺陷,导致"共犯正犯化"在逻辑体系上难以获得正当性。共犯的成立并不需要事前的犯意联络,片面共犯亦应成立共犯;对于正犯与主犯也不能按照实质客观说加以混同,而是应当立足我国刑法规定严格加以区分。The incessant spread of cybercrime induces people＇s misgivings about cyber security. The expansion of accomplice becoming principal offender is the resuh of the masses requiring for protecting legal benefit completely. Accomplice becoming principal offender cannot be justified logically due to the contradiction and defect of its theoretical basis that is hard to reconcile, such as the theory of independency of accomplice, behavior invaluable dualism and theory of positive general prevention. The accomplice doesn＇t need prior intention liaison, and one-sided accomplice should be admitted. The principal and accomplice should be strictly distinguished according to the stipulations of our criminal law rather than confusing them by actual objective standard.

关 键 词：网络犯罪 共犯正犯化 共犯独立性 片面共犯 形式客观说 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]