检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑晓[1] 吴叶晨[1] 吴军[1] 王田田[1] 高道键[1] 胡冰[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学附属东方肝胆外科医院内镜科,上海200438
出 处:《中华消化内镜杂志》2017年第5期332-336,共5页Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
基 金:上海市医学领军人才计划(2015-83)
摘 要:目的分析经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后乳头部延迟性出血的特征及可能出血原因,探索有效的止血方法及其策略。方法回顾性分析2000年8月至2016年8月在第二军医大学附属东方肝胆外科医院内镜科因ERCP后出血行内镜诊疗的76例患者的临床资料、止血方法及其疗效。结果ERCP后延迟性出血多发生于ERCP后48h内(67.2%,45/67),主要表现为呕血、血便及鼻胆管内血性引流物等。单纯内镜下十二指肠乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)的出血率最低(0.1%),其次是乳头预切开(0.6%)和内镜下乳头括约肌切开术(EST,0.9%),EST+EPBD的出血率最高(2.4%),出血部位多位于乳头切缘左侧(67.1%,51/76)。所有患者均行急诊内镜止血,序贯给予冰肾上腺素盐水注射、电凝、止血夹封闭、金属支架压迫等内镜止血治疗。71例患者内镜止血成功(93.4%),其中1次成功66例,2次成功4例,3次成功1例。止血夹封闭止血成功率76.9%(50/65)。结论针刀预切开术是安全、有效的,且其并发症发生率与EST相似。对于实施乳头部中小切开和/或扩张的患者,仍应做好出血并发症的预防与处理。临床上一旦怀疑出血应及时内镜干预,绝大多数病例可在内镜下成功止血,止血夹封闭是较为可靠的止血方法。Objective To evaluate the clinical feature and potential reasons of delayed papillary bleeding after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and search for effective hemostasis and strategies. Methods A total of 76 patients with post-ERCP bleeding underwent endoscopic treatment in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital from August 2000 to August 2016. Clinical data, haemostatie methods, and treatment outcomes of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results Delayed papillary hemorrhage mostly occurred within 48 hours after ERCP ( 67.2%, 45/67 ) , with main manifestations of hematemesis, bloody stool, and bile. The lowest incidence of delayed bleeding was detected after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD, 0. 1%), which was followed by papillary precut (0.6%) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST, 0. 9%). And EST+EPBD had the highest incidence of delayed post-ERCP papillary hemorrhage (2.4%). The most bleeding site was the left side of the incision (67. 1%, 51/76). Emergent endoscopic interventions were applied in all patients with success of hemostasis in 71 out of 76 (93.4%) , and injection with diluted epinephrine, electric coagulation, hemoclipping, and metal stenting were used sequentially for hemostasis. Among the 71 successful cases of hemostasis, 66 patients were performed endoscopic hemostasis for once, 4 patients took twice, and 1 case took thrice. Endoscopic hemoclipping wasthe most commonly used method with successful rate of 76. 9% (50/65) for hemostasis. Conclusion Precut papillotomy is safe and effective, and its complication occurrence rate is similar to that of EST. Hemorrhage should be prevented and timely dealt with in small/median EST and/or EPBD. Once hemorrhage is suspected clinically, endoscopic inventions should be applied timely, and hemoclipping is a safe and effective method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117