机构地区:[1]北京大学地坛医院教学医院,100015 [2]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院妇产科 [3]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院肝病中心肝病二科 [4]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院检验科 [5]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院传染病研究所 [6]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院病案科
出 处:《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》2017年第2期142-147,共6页Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基 金:北京市卫生系统高层次卫生人才项目(2015-3-106);北京市科技计划课题“首都医学特色”项目(Z151100004015122);北京市科学技术委员会重大项目(D121100003912001)
摘 要:目的 观察在标准免疫预防HBIG+乙肝疫苗(0、1、6)的基础上,于出生后1个月再次注射HBIG 200 IU 1次对提高HBV母婴阻断效果的作用.方法 入组HBsAg与HBeAg阳性、HBV DNA≥1.0×106 IU/ml且妊娠期间未使用抗乙肝病毒药物的慢性HBV感染孕妇及其所生新生儿.新生儿被随机分配到对照组和实验组,对照组新生儿给予标准HBV预防免疫接种方案:200 IU HBIG+10 μg重组乙型肝炎疫苗(0、1、6个月),实验组:在标准预防的基础上于新生儿出生后1个月时再次注射200 IU HBIG.并于出生时和出生后7个月检测静脉血中HBsAg、抗HBs、HBV DNA.新生儿出生后7个月血清 HBsAg和/或HBV DNA阳性定义为HBV母婴阻断失败.结果 本研究共入组280例新生儿,后期随访过程中失访14例(实验组6例,对照组8例),最终完成随访266例(实验组134例,对照组132例),本研究对完成随访的人数进行统计分析.实验组和对照组母亲产前HBV DNA载量分别为7.31±0.66 log10IU/ml和7.32±0.74 log10IU/ml(t=0.11,P=0.92);实验组和对照组HBV阻断失败率分别为5.97%(8/134)和7.58%(10/132),差异无统计学意义(P=0.63);实验组新生儿的抗HBs阳性(≥10 mIU/ml)率及其水平分别为94.03%和(623.60±412.93 mIU/ml),与对照组的抗HBs阳性率(91.67%)及水平(620.38±399.10 mIU/ml)差异无统计学意义(P=0.48, P=0.95).18例阻断失败新生儿母亲分娩前HBV DNA载量(7.58±0.62 log10IU/ml)高于248例阻断成功组(7.29±0.70 log10IU/ml)(P=0.09);阻断失败新生儿出生时静脉血HBsAg阳性百分率和HBV DNA阳性率均为100%,显著高于阻断成功新生儿HBsAg阳性率(35.89%)和HBV DNA阳性率(31.85%)(P <0.001).Logistic回归分析显示,新生儿静脉血中 HBsAg阳性为乙肝病毒母婴阻断失败的独立相关因素(OR 1.39 95%CI 1.14~1.68).分层分析结果显示, 新生儿静脉血HBsAg在0.05-〈 1、 1-Objective To investigate the efficacy of 200IU hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) injection at 1 month after birth to interrupt the mother-to-children transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV).Methods Infants born to mothers who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, with HBV DNA load ≥1.0×106 IU/ml and who did not receive antiviral drug treatment during pregnancy, were randomly divided into 2 groups.Infants in the control group were treated with standard immunoprophylaxis: 200 IU HBIG and 10 μg recombinant hepatitis B vaccine injection within 2 h after birth and a vaccine booster at 1 and 6 months after birth.For infants in the HBIG group the standard immunoprophylaxis and an additional 200 IU HBIG were administered at 1 month.HBsAg, the antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs), and HBV DNA load were measured at birth and after 7 months.later.Immunoprophylaxis failure was defined as the presence of HBV DNA and HBsAg positivity or the presence of HBV DNA and HBsAg negativity at 7 months.Results In this prospective cohort study, of the 280 infants enrolled, 14 infants (HBIG/control: 6/8) were lost to follow-up and 266 subjects (HBIG/control: 134/132) completed the 7-month study.The log10 HBV DNA load of mothers in the HBIG group and control group were (7.31±0.66) log10IU/ml and (7.32±0.74) log10IU/ml, respectively (P=0.92).The MTCT rate of the two groups was similar (5.97% vs.7.58%, P=0.63).At 7 months, the HBsAg positive rate and the level of anti-HBs in the two groups were 94.03%(126/134)vs.91.67% (121/132) and 623.60±412.93 mIU/mL vs.620.38±399.10 mIU/ml, respectively with no significant difference (P=0.48 and P=0.95, respectively).The log10 HBV DNA load of mothers in immunoprophylaxis failure group and success group was similar (P=0.09).The number of infants who were serum HBsAg positive and HBV DNA positive at birth in the immunoprophylaxis failure group were higher
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...