检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:娄本海
机构地区:[1]河南省长葛市人民医院骨科,河南长葛461500
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2017年第9期33-34,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨和分析有限内固定结合外固定支架治疗Pilon骨折的疗效.方法:选取2013年12月~2016年3月期间在我院接受临床治疗的77例Pilon骨折患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为2组,对照组有38例患者,研究组有39例患者,对对照组患者进行切开复位内固定治疗,对研究组患者进行有限内固定结合外固定支架治疗,分析2组患者的效果.结果:研究组患者的临床治疗总有效率(92.31%)与对照组患者(68.42%)相比较,组间差异明显(P〈0.05),研究组患者的治疗满意度(89.74%)与对照组患者(76.32%)相比较,组间差异明显(P〈0.05).结论:对Pilon骨折患者实施有限内固定结合外固定支架治疗的效果较好.Objective: To study and analysis of the curative effect of limited internal fixation combined with external fixator for Pilon fractures. Methods: To choose between December 2013 and March 2016 in our hospital during the period of clinical treatment of 77 cases of Pilon fractures patients as the research object, divided into two groups according to random number table method, the control group has 38 patients, the research group has 39 patients, the control group patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation, the research group patients treated with limited internal fixation combined with external fixation, analysis the effect of two groups patients. Results:The total effective rate of the research group patients (92.31%) compared with the control group patients (68.42%), with clear difference between groups (P 〈 0.05), the treatment satisfaction of the research group patients (89.74%) compared with the control group patients (76.32%), with clear difference between groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: The treatment effect of limited internal fixation combined with external fixator for Pilon fractures was better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229