检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宝[1] ZHANG Bao(Law School, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083,China)
出 处:《法学论坛》2017年第3期14-21,共8页Legal Forum
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"环境诉讼特别程序研究"(14SF0044);湖南省社科基金项目"检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼研究"(15YBA383)的部分成果;法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台资助
摘 要:生态环境损害政府索赔制度旨在解决环境保护"公地悲剧"引发的"企业污染、政府买单"困局,但也与行政机关可以责令消除、修复环境并适用代履行的规定发生矛盾,故政府索赔应限缩到生态环境无法修复、因而无法适用上述规定的情形。从法律的体系性和逻辑的一致性来看,宜在未来修改法律时进一步增加不能修复时责令赔偿的规定,并通过行政公益诉讼监督政府履行监管职责。The government claim for ecological damage aims to solve the dilemma of " polluted by the enterprises,paid by the government" which caused by the tragedy of commons,however,this approach also raises contradictions with environmental regulation,as current laws have already set out a series of rules to rectify the illegal activities and relieve the ecological damage. As a result,the governmental claim shall be limited to circumstances which cannot be solved by administrative procedures. A better way is to directly order the offenders compensating the ecological damage in administrative laws,and allow competent organs or organizations to supervise the environmental regulation through administrative public interest litigations.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249