“第三方”主体参与巡视工作的实践路径分析  

Analysis of Practical Path of “Third Party” Involvement in Inspection

作　　者：王仰文[1] 

机构地区：[1]聊城大学法学院,山东聊城252000

出　　处：《福建行政学院学报》2017年第3期58-65,共8页Journal of Fujian Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(15FFX013);山东省法学会重点项目[SLS(2015)E9]

摘　　要：在党的十八大之后,中国反腐进入了生死时速的新阶段。以政治体检为核心内容的巡视工作面临着更加复杂的变局,这也给巡视工作的实践创新提出了更高要求。"第三方"主体参与巡视监督方式的提出与援用,顺应了国家治理现代化的历史潮流,不仅有坚实的民主基础,也可以更为充分地展示出中国的制度自信。当然,基于党内巡视的保密要求,这一制度探索也会遭遇外来干扰和效果不佳的潜在忧虑。对这一制度革新的实践探索,需要遵循全面推进从严治党发展的基本指向,坚持中央纪委主导的基本原则,严把"第三方"准入条件,并建立刚性的制度约束。After the 18th Party Congress, China^s anti-corruption has entered a new stage of life and death. As the core content of the political inspection, the patrol practice is facing more complex changes, which also puts forward higher requirements to the patrol practice innovation. The way of introduction and reference of the ＂Third party＂ to participate in the supervision and supervision, which is conforming to the historical trend of nation~/1 governance modernization, is not only a solid democratic foundation, but also can more fully demonstrate the Chinese system of self-confidence. Of course, based on the secrecy requirements of the party patrol, this system will also experience external interference and poor potential concerns. The practical exploration of this system innovation needs to follow the basic guiding principle of comprehensively promoting the development of the ruling Party, adhere to the basic principles led by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, strictly enforce ＂the third party＂ conditions and establish rigid institutional constraints.

关 键 词：“第三方”主体 巡视制度 工作创新 制度反腐 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]