乙型肝炎患者血小板计数与中性粒细胞绝对值比值和红细胞体积分布宽度的变化及临床意义  被引量:2

Changes and clinical significance of platelet count to neutrophil lymphocyte absolute value ratio and red blood cell volume distribution width in patients with hepatitis B

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴美玲[1] 刘芸[1] 王晓瑞[1] 栾芳[1] 成士清[1] 宋晓斐[1] 王勇[1] 张炳昌[1] 鞠瑛[1] 

机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院检验医学部,济南250021

出  处:《中国医药》2017年第6期888-891,共4页China Medicine

基  金:国家自然科学基金(81000731);山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金(BS2010YY045)

摘  要:目的探讨乙型肝炎患者血小板计数与中性粒细胞绝对值比值(PNR)、红细胞体积分布宽度(RDW)的变化及临床意义。方法选取2016年5-7月山东大学附属省立医院59例乙型肝炎患者(乙型肝炎组)和124名体检健康志愿者(正常对照组)为研究对象,采集外周血标本,检测血常规、肝功能[丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)]、乙型肝炎超敏DNA和乙型肝炎表面抗原定量指标并进行分析。结果乙型肝炎组PNR低于、RDW高于正常对照组,差异均有统计学意义[57.33(45.48,70.95)比71.07(59.84,83.24)、12.45%(12.10%,13.18%)比12.30%(12.00%,12.50%)](均P〈0.05)。乙型肝炎组根据受试者工作曲线选取最佳截点分为低PNR组(PNR〈65.55,40例)与高PNR组(PNR≥65.55,19例)、低RDW组(RDW〈12.45%,37例)与高RDW组(RDW≥12.45%,22例)。低PNR组与高PNR组AST、ATJT、GGT差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05);高RDW组AST、ALT、GGT分别为46.50(27.75,140.75)、40.00(25.75,121.25)、(45±42)U/L,高于低RDW组的25.00(19.50,31.OO)、22.00(15.50,36.00)、(29±20)U/L,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-3.56、-2.63、-2.03,均P〈0.05)。低RDW组与高RDW组乙型肝炎超敏DNA和乙型肝炎表面抗原定量差异均无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。结论PNR、RDW对乙型肝炎患者与正常人的辅助鉴别有一定的价值。[ Abstract ] Objective To explore changes and clinical significance of platelet count to neutrophil lymphocyte absolute value ratio (PNR) and red blood cell volume distribution width (RDW) in patients with hepatitis B. Methods From May to July 2016, 59 patients with hepatitis B (Hepatitis B group) and 124 healthy volunteers( normal control group) were enrolled in Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University; blood routine, liver indexes [ alanine aminotransferase ( ALT ), aspartate aminotransferase ( AST ), glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)], high sensitivity hepatitis B virus (HS-HBV) DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were tested. Results The value of PNR in hepatitis B group was significantly lower and RDW was significantly higher than those in normal control group [ 57.33 (45.48, 70. 95 ) vs 71.07 ( 59.84, 83.24 ) ; 12. 45% ( 12. 10% , 13.18% ) vs 12. 30% ( 12. 00%, 12.50% ) ] ( P 〈 0. 05 ). According to the optimal cutoff value determined by receiver operating characteristic curve, the hepatitis B group were divided into low PNR group ( PNR 〈 65.55, 40 cases) and high PNR group ( PNR ≥ 65.55, 19 cases), low RDW group ( RDW 〈 12.45, 37cases) and high RDW group ( RDW ≥ 12.45, 22cases). Levels of AST, ALT and GGT had no significant differences between low and high PNR groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Levels of AST, ALT and GGT in high RDW group were significantly higher than those in low RDW group [ 46. 50 ( 27.75, 140. 75 ) U/L vs 25.00 ( 19.50, 31. 00 ) U/L, 40.00(25.75, 121.25)U/Lvs22.00(15.50, 36.00)U/L, (45 ±42)U/L vs (29 ±20)U/L](Z= -3.56, - 2. 63, - 2.03 ; P 〈 0. 05 ). Values of HS-HBV DNA and HBsAg had no significant differences between low andhigh RDW groups(P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion PNR and RDW can contribute to the identification of hepatitis B.

关 键 词:乙型肝炎 血小板计数与中性粒细胞绝对值比值 红细胞体积分布宽度 

分 类 号:R512.6[医药卫生—内科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象