检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王杨扬 赵中秋[1,2] 原野[1] 陈路明[1] 郭安宁[1]
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院,北京100083 [2]国土资源部土地整治重点实验室,北京100035
出 处:《农业环境科学学报》2017年第5期966-973,共8页Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基 金:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项--典型露天煤矿复垦生物多样性恢复研究(201411017)~~
摘 要:为了解不同复垦模式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性的影响,选择山西省朔州市安太堡露天矿排土场为研究区,采取典型小区调查的方法,分析了复垦21、22 a的4种混交林复垦模式(刺槐+油松、刺槐+榆树+臭椿、刺槐+柠条+沙棘、沙棘+榆树)、2种纯林复垦模式(刺槐纯林、沙棘纯林)以及复垦耕地的土壤水稳性大团聚体的含量、土壤团聚体的稳定率(WSAR)、几何平均直径(GMD)、平均重量直径(MWD)、破坏率(PAD),并通过和原地貌及未复垦地相应指标进行对比,来研究不同复垦模式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性的影响。研究结果表明:经多年复垦后,土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性有了显著提高,在团聚体DR0.25(>0.25 mm团聚体质量)、WSAR、MWD和GMD值上呈现出4种混交林复垦模式>2种纯林复垦模式>未复垦林地,以及林地>内排耕地的总体趋势;土壤水稳性团聚体PAD值呈现出相反的排序。上述复垦模式中,刺槐+油松复垦模式下土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性最好。土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性的评价指标中,DR0.25、WSAR、MWD与GMD之间相互呈极显著正相关,且均与PAD呈极显著负相关。该研究结果可为黄土区露天煤矿土地复垦及土壤重构提供一定依据。Abstract: To understand the effects of different reclamation patterns on the stability of soil water-stable aggregates, reclaimed dumps of the Antaibao opencast mine in Shuozhou, Shanxi Province, which is located in the northwest Loess Plateau of China, were chosen for this case study. Soils were sampled in four mixed forest reclamation patterns(Robinia pseudoacacia L.+Pinus tabulaeformis C., Robinia pseudoacacia L.+Ulmus pumila L.+Ailanthus altissima M., Robinia pseudoacacia L.+Caragana korshinskii K.+Hippophae rhamnoides L., Hippophae rhamnoides L.+Ulmus pumila L.);two types of pure forest reclamation patterns(Robinia pseudoacacia L. forest and Robinia pseudoacacia L. forest);the arable land. The original landform and un-reclaimed land were taken as control. The content of water-stable macro-aggre-gates, soil water-stable aggregates stability rate(WSAR), geometric mean diameter(GMD), mean weight diameter(MWD), and failure rate (PAD)were analyzed. The results showed that, after years of reclamation, the stability of soil water-stable aggregates has significantly im-proved.The values of DR0.25, WSAR, MWD, and GMD of aggregates ranked as:four mixed forest reclamation patterns〉two pure forest recla-mation patterns〉un-reclaimed land, forest land〉arable land.The PAD values of soil water stable aggregates showed the opposite order. The stability of soil water-stable aggregates was the best under the Robinia pseudoacacia L.+Pinus tabulaeformis C. pattern. There was a signif-icant positive correlation among DR0.25, WSAR, MWD, and GMD in the evaluation indices of the soil water-stable aggregates, and they all had extremely significant negative correlation with PAD. These results can provide some basis for land reclamation and soil remodeling of opencast mines in Loess areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.232