检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学 [2]浙江大学海洋学院 [3]浙江海洋大学
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2017年第3期405-415,共11页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
摘 要:本研究考察中国学生汉英名词产出过程中的词汇竞争及其重复启动效应。名词刺激或者只有一个占据主导地位的相关名词反应(低竞争)或者有几个较为相关的潜在反应(高竞争),受试产出由呈现的高竞争或低竞争名词刺激联想到的另一相关名词。研究发现:1)受试汉英高竞争名词产出的反应时均明显慢于其低竞争名词反应时,说明名词产出过程中存在词汇竞争效应;2)受试对已学名词刺激引发的名词产出时间明显快于未学名词刺激的反应时间,说明名词产出过程中存在重复启动效应;3)受试一语汉语高、低词汇竞争条件下名词产出的反应时和重复启动效应量均小于其二语英语,表明语言熟练程度影响汉英双语者名词产出过程的词汇竞争及其重复启动效应。This study aimed to investigate the effects of lexical competition and repetition priming for noun generation among Chinese-English bilinguals. The noun stimuli had either one dominant response(low competition, LC) or several potential responses(high competition, HC), and the participants were required to generate a noun that was associated with the presented HC or LC noun stimulus. The results indicated that:(1) the mean response times(RTs) of the HC Chinese and English noun production were significantly slower than those of the LC noun production, indicating lexical competition effects;(2) for both Chinese and English noun generation tasks, the mean RTs to studied HC and LC stimuli were significantly shorter compared to those of non-studied stimuli, indicating there were repetition priming effects;(3) significant differences were observed in the response latencies and the magnitude of repetition priming between participants' first and second language word generation performance to HC and LC cue words, indicating the effects of language proficiency on lexical competition and repetition priming in noun generation tasks among Chinese-English bilinguals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249