检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁守真[1,2] 隋学艳 侯学会 王猛 姚慧敏 马万栋[3]
机构地区:[1]山东省农业可持续发展研究所,济南250100 [2]中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院,深圳518055 [3]环境保护部卫星环境应用中心,北京100094
出 处:《生态学报》2017年第10期3415-3424,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41401407);山东省农业重大应用技术创新项目(1-05-04)
摘 要:冠层绿色叶片(光合组分)的光合有效辐射分量(绿色FPAR)真实地反映了植被与外界进行物质和能量交换的能力,获取冠层光合组分吸收的太阳光合有效辐射,对生态系统生产力的遥感估算精度的提高具有重要的意义。研究以落叶阔叶林为例,基于SAIL模型模拟森林冠层光合组分和非光合组分吸收的光合有效辐射,研究冠层FPAR变化规律以及与植被指数的相关关系。结果表明,冠层结构的改变会影响冠层对PAR的吸收能力,冠层绿色FPAR的大小与植被面积指数及光合组分面积比相关;在高覆盖度植被区,冠层绿色FPAR占冠层总FPAR的80%以上,非光合组分的贡献较小,但在低植被覆盖区,当光合组分和非光合组分面积相同时,绿色FPAR不及冠层总FPAR的50%;相比于NDVI,北方落叶阔叶林冠层EVI与绿色FPAR存在更为显著的线性相关关系(R^2>0.99)。The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) is an important biophysical variable, widely used in satellite-based production efficiency models to estimate global primary production(GPP) or net primary production. To the forest, the vegetation canopy is composed primarily of photosynthetically active vegetation (PAV; green leaf) and non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV; e.g., branches and stems). They absorb photosynthetically active radiation(PAR) from the sun, but only the PAR absorbed by PAV is used for photosynthesis. Remote sensing-driven biogeochemical models that use green FPAR(FPARPAV) in estimating GPP are more likely to be consistent with plant photosynthesis processes. However, there are no field and laboratory experiments to measure green FPAR at the canopy level. In this study, a method based on the radiative transfer model was used, and the scattering by arbitrary inclined leaves (SAIL) model was modified to classify forest canopy, and to model the canopy spectral reflectance and the PAR absorbed by PAV and NPV of three deciduous broadleaved forests in different scenarios (varied plant area index and leaf area index). Green FPAR of the canopy was calculated based on the PAR absorbed by PAV and total PAR, and the characteristics of the green FPAR and the relation between green FPAR and two vegetation indices (normalize difference vegetation index [NDVI] and enhanced vegetation index [EVI]) were analyzed. Our results showed that the variation in canopy structure influenced the canopy absorption of PAR, and that green FPAR was related to the plant area index and the ratio of leaf area index to plant area index. In high-coverage forests, the green FPAR was close to the total FPAR of the vegetation canopy(〉 80%) and the contribution of NPV to the total FPAR is very low. In contrast, in low-coverage forests or open forests, the difference between green FPAR and the total FPAR was large. Especially when the proportion of the leaf area to plant a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117