最高人民法院介入宏观调控的实践与反思  

The Involvement of the Supreme People's Court of China in Macro-economic Adjustment and Control:Practice and Reflection

作　　者：张家宇[1] ZHANG Jiayu(Institute of Law, Anhui University of Science ＆ Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学法学研究所,安徽淮南232001

出　　处：《燕山大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第3期24-30,共7页Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：安徽省高等教育振兴计划项目(Szzgjh1-1-2016-8)

摘　　要：尽管我国宪法和法律没有赋予最高人民法院宏观调控的职权(职责),但它还是积极主动地介入到宏观调控。最高人民法院介入宏观调控,虽然具有一定的合理性,但也为我国法治建设带来隐忧。罗斯福新政时期,美国最高法院介入宏观调控的经验教训,给我国有益启示。从法治的立场看,最高人民法院在宏观调控中应保持司法克制。Although the Supreme People＇ s Court of China is not vested the power or duty of macro-economic adjustment and control by China＇ s constitution and law, it still actively takes part in these activities.To a cer- tain extent, it is reasonable that the Supreme People＇ s Court of China gets involved in macro-economic adjust- ment and control, but it also brings latent dangers to China＇ s law system construction. During the period of Roosevelt＇ s New Deal, the Supreme Court of the United States＇ intervention in macro-economic adjustment and control gives us beneficial enlightenment.From a perspective of rule of law, the Supreme People＇ s Court of China should exhibit certain judicial restraint in its macro-economic adjustment and control.

关 键 词：最高人民法院 宏观调控权 司法克制 法治思维 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]