庭审实质化背景下刑事裁判文书内容建构与说理探析  

On the construction and reasoning of the content of criminal judgment documents in the context of substantive trial

作　　者：边锋[1] 袁俊峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳市中级人民法院,辽宁沈阳110013

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2017年第3期33-38,共6页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：合格的刑事裁判文书应达到向当事人释法明理和向社会展示法律执行情况的双重效果。刑事裁判文书需要依附在案件审理的基础之上,全面反映控辩主张、查明事实、证据体系以及说理依据等方面内容。在当前深入落实以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革的潮流下,应当完整地将庭审实质化的改革内容在裁判文书中体现出来,从撰写裁判文书应关注的内容结构、表达要点、说理分析过程等关键元素入手,完善裁判文书的内容建构和说理过程,从而实现普通受众透过裁判文书感受到诉讼制度改革的成效。Qualified criminal judgment documents should be achieved the dual effect of explaining the law to the parties and showing the implementation of the law to the community. Criminal judgment documents need to be at- tached to the basis of hearing a case, and comprehensively reflect the prosecution claims,identifying the facts, the evidence system, reasoning basis and other contents. In the current trend of in - depth implementation of the trial - centered reform of the litigation system, the reform contents of the substantive trial was reflected completely in the judgment documents to realize that the ordinary audiences could feel the effectiveness of the reform by the judgment documents. The content of the reform of the substantive trial is reflected in the judgment documents, started from the content structure, expression points, reasoning analysis process and other key elements should paid attention to in writing the judgment documents, to improve the content construction and reasoning process of the judgement documents.

关 键 词：庭审实质化 新元素 适用 裁判文书 

分 类 号：DF813[政治法律—法学]