体系化视角下食品侵权损害惩罚性赔偿规则协调研究  

Coordination of Punitive Damage Rules in Systematic Context of Food Infringement

作　　者：周航[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《中国食物与营养》2017年第4期15-19,共5页Food and Nutrition in China

摘　　要：2009年颁布的《食品安全法》于2015年进行了大幅修订,其中对食品侵权损害中的惩罚性赔偿规则也进行了完善,但是仍然存在一些值得研究的问题。一是第148条规定本身设计的科学性和合理性尚不足以实现惩罚性赔偿规则拟实现的目标;二是《食品安全法》第148条规定和其他相关法律规则之间的内在统一性和协调性尚待进一步提高;三是惩罚性赔偿规则在适用上的领域特定性及其他条件限制减损了其规则功能。食品损害惩罚性赔偿条款的设计只有考虑到该制度的立法功能,注意立法体系上的完整性、统一性和协调性,落实和强化其在实践中的可操作性,食品侵权惩罚性赔偿规则才可以实现其调整社会关系、遏制食品领域侵权行为高发态势的功能。Revising Food Safety Law 2009 has improved the punitive damages in the context of food infringement in 2015, however, there still exists relevant deficiencies that will be indicated as follows. Firstly, the article 148 is not sensible or scientific to achieve its legislative intent. Secondly, enhancing the internal unity and coordination between the article 148 and other rules is necessary. Thirdly, its application and other restrictions in specific-area damages the nile functions. Thus, the suggested recommendations of designing food punitive damages clause including considering the legislative functions in the context of Food Law, maximizing the integrity, heightening its unity and coordination within the litigation, and strengthening the practical maneuverability. Only then, the punitive damage rules can attaint its established functions, adjust the social relations and restrict the risky trends of food infringements.

关 键 词：食品侵权 惩罚性赔偿 功能 体系协调 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]