检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第3期270-275,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(15AGL017)
摘 要:在政策工具研究形成的技术论、设计论和过程论三个流派中,技术论过于微观、发散,并且与其他研究领域重叠;设计论趋于抽象、复杂,与经验分析存在一定距离;过程论的优势在于,它是事实与规范结合最为均衡的视角,并且与政策过程论有着高度的契合性。对政策工具形成、运用、变迁的认识构成了理解政策工具全生命周期运转的逻辑基础。根据近年来政策工具理论的发展,结合对政策工具过程理论优势和逻辑基础的分析,可总结出政策工具议程、工具-制度变迁及政策工具创新三个过程论的主要分析框架,从而为推进政策工具研究提供参考。In the three schools of technical theory, design theory and process theory formed during the research of policy instruments, the technical school is too microscopic, diverging, and overlapping with other areas of research, and the design school tends to be abstract and complex, departing from the empirical analysis. Among the three schools, the process theory is the most balanced perspective, which combines facts and norms and has a high degree of fit with the policy process theory. The understanding of policy instrument formation, application and change constitutes the logical foundation for understanding the whole life cycle of policy instruments. Based on the recent developments of the policy instrument theory and the analysis of the theoretical advantages together with the logic basis of the policy instrument process, three main analytical frameworks of the process theory should be summed up in terms of policy instrument agenda, instrument-institution change and policy instrument innovation so as to provide references for the promotion of policy instrument research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117