检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院药学部,内蒙古包头014010
出 处:《中国药业》2017年第9期85-87,共3页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的了解医院抗肿瘤辅助用药使用情况,为临床合理用药提供参考。方法利用医院合理用药系统(PASS),选取医院2016年7月至12月抗肿瘤辅助用药病历801份,对抗肿瘤辅助用药医嘱进行点评。结果 801份病历中,有240份存在不合理用药,合理率为70.04%;不合理用药主要表现为适应证不适宜、用法用量不适宜、溶剂选择不适宜及联合用药不适宜等;抗肿瘤辅助用药金额排名前10位医嘱点评合格率最高的为斑蝥维生素B6注射液(98.36%),合格率最低的为磷酸肌酸钠注射液(52.34%)。结论医院抗肿瘤辅助用药存在不合理使用情况,应加强用药干预及行政监督,以规范抗肿瘤辅助用药的临床应用。Objective To investigate the utilization of anti- tumor adjuvant drugs to provide references for rational use in the clinical. Methods Based on clinical pharmacy management system(SPSS), 801 cases of anti- tumor adjuvant medication were selected and reviewed from July 2016 to November in our hospital. Results Among 801 medical records, there were 240 irrational medical records of anti -tumor adjutant drugs, with qualified rate of 70. 04%. The types of irrational drag use were inappropriate of indication, dosage, solvent and drug combination. Among Top 10 of anti-tumor adjutant drugs in the list of amount ranking, the qualified rate of Can- tharidinate and Vitamin B6 Injection was the highest(98.36% ), Phosphocreatine Sodium was the lowest(52.34% ). Conclusion It has irrational use of anti- tumor adjuvant medication in our hospital, we should strengthen the use of drug intervention and administrative supervision to standardized the management for rational drug use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225